Q: Why do we need another new tax?

May 5, 2009

A: Short Answer:  Internet Sales Tax is not a new tax, simply a largely uncollected tax.

A: Long Answer:  Many taxpayers are surprised to learn that even though they were not charged sales tax when they purchased something online, they still owe local “use tax” on that purchase.  Use taxes are the same rate as sales taxes (calculated as though the purchase happened at your doorstep).  Unfortunately, collection and enforcement of use taxes is cost prohibitive – states revenue departments simply don’t have the resources to track down every iTunes download or eBay purchase.

The new laws being considered would eliminate the current taxpayer obligation (or liability) to report and pay use taxes for items or services purchased over the Internet.

The new laws would shift the burden of tax collection to the point of sale, exactly the same as if you walked into your local convenience store to buy some batteries. 

Some Internet merchants have begun to complain that under these new laws, keeping track of all possible tax codes and jurisdictions would be simply too complicated.  This is where we come in – at Fed-Tax.net, we are eliminating all of that complexity – at zero additional cost to the merchant or the taxpayer (thats’ right – our services are absoultely FREE)


Q: Why are interstate Sales Tax laws changing?

May 5, 2009

A:  Short Answer: It is simply unfair to require local businesses to collect and remit local sales taxes, while not requiring so-called “remote sellers” to do the same.

A: Long Answer: Historically these remote sellers were primarily mail order catalog merchants.  Although the US Supreme Court uniformly agreed (in 1967 and 1992) that these remote sellers should be required to remit local sales taxes as if they were local businesses, they also conceded that requiring these remote sellers to keep track of over 13,000 state and local tax codes would be prohibitively cumbersome and costly.  They further ruled that only congress has the authority to modify such rules of interstate taxation.  Consequently, the laws of the land settled on the side of allowing remote sellers to be exempt from collecting local sales taxes, to eliminate the competitive disadvantage which would have been caused by mandating local sales tax compliance.  However, with the success of the Internet over the last twenty five years, this disadvantage has shifted from the remote sellers to the local businesses.  Today, while local vendors are required to collect local sales tax, they are competing over price with Internet vendors unencumbered by such additional price pressures.


Q: Do I have to charge sales tax to my customers in states where I dont have any operations?

May 5, 2009

A:  Short Answer:  No.  Or at least not yet, but probably very soon.


Q: What Internet purchases will be subject to sales tax?

May 5, 2009

A: Under the Streamlined Sales Tax Agreement guidelines, sales taxes are to be collected by Internet merchants uniformly on all sales (including leases and rentals) involving tangible personal property, or digital goods and services, including telecommunications and Internet access services.


Internet Sales should be taxed.

May 4, 2009

Such a statement seems to cause a great deal of anxiety – but why?

The ability of state and local governments to collect sales and use tax on transactions which occur through traditional retail outlets is widely accepted and understood. Although taxes are particularly unpopular, we all know that taxes are necessary to fund such vital government services as education and public safety. Voters routinely approve local sales taxes to pay for sports facilities, police protection, land acquisitions for public spaces, and transportation projects. It is simply unfair to require local businesses to collect and remit local sales taxes, while not requiring so-called “remote sellers” to do the same.

With contemporary companies like Amazon.com® and services like Apple® iTunes®, no one questions their technical ability to keep track of hundreds of thousands of products, and over 30 million transactions per quarter.  Based upon such technological and business advances, many states have been working on tax-code modernization and standardization efforts to ensure keeping track of this information could no longer be considered unreasonable – even with the thousands of rule and jurisdictional boundary changes each year, and the wide variety of exemptions and exceptions which vary from state to state.

With Internet e-commerce sales revenues in the United States reaching over $2.5 trillion in 2007, the states’ inability to collect related sales taxes on these transactions cost them over $7 billion in lost revenue, in 2007 alone.  Now, with the economy in distress, and many states enduring significant budget shortfalls, congress is preparing to act.  The “Main Street Fairness Act of 2009″ is now set to be introduced before congress, and is drafted “to grant states the authority to require all sellers, regardless of nexus, to collect those states’ sales and use taxes”.

What do you think?


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 402 other followers